Skip to content

Mark Ten

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 122nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Mark Ten supported this idea  · 
  2. 61st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Mark Ten supported this idea  · 
  3. 69th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Mark Ten supported this idea  · 
  4. 32nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Mark Ten supported this idea  · 
  5. 28th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Ten commented  · 

    I have no problem with some moderation, but it seems that the moderation is a one way street and does not actually review what it prevents for posts. If it actually reviewed the initial posts being replied to they might make a different response. instead, it appears if people post responses to an initial post that is misleading, outright lies or is somehow a racist, sexist or otherwise hateful post, why not review the original post in the thread? That does not seem to happen and, instead, the response....no matter how well thought and backed by facts on the ground, is shut down instead. So now, all I can do is report the misleading posts instead of responding to them with facts. Joy.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Ten commented  · 

    Indeed, I have been bitten by this situation.. no details as to WHY. No way to refute the judgment or to show a HISTORY of the postings. Just no longer able to post a well thought response to an article. Not even through the posting censor...just no way to even initiate a post. I am thinking of cancelling my 20+ year Yahoo membership as this is foolish and I have not violated any posting terms that I am aware of.....yet other people who 1repeatedly lie, abuse others with racist innuendo continue to post on the very same threads I am attempting to post to. Either this gets corrected within a week or I will search for a new *news* source and e-mail.

    Mark Ten supported this idea  · 
  6. 31st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Mark Ten supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base